Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Asus |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black Glare |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone II is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a score of 88 against 75.4. Even being the best phone we compare here, the Asus ROG Phone II design is older, a lot heavier and somewhat thicker than the vivo X50 Pro. The Asus ROG Phone II has a little better processing power than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone II also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Asus ROG Phone II features a bit better looking screen than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a quite worse pixels number in each inch in the screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, they both have a screen with the same size. The Asus ROG Phone II shoots a bit better photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels resolution and the same video resolution, the Asus ROG Phone II also counts with higher video frame rates and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Asus ROG Phone II features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Asus ROG Phone II counts with a really longer battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.