Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a general score of 81.3 against 75.4. Google Pixel XL's body is just a little bit lighter than the vivo X50 Pro, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Google Pixel XL features a little sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The vivo X50 Pro has a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X50 Pro has a superior camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The vivo X50 Pro has longer battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4315mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.