Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a score of 77, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. Even though LG V20 is extremely older than vivo X50 Pro, it's design is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter. Vivo X50 Pro features just a little better performance than LG V20, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
LG V20 has a little bit better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Vivo X50 Pro captures better photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size sensor, the vivo X50 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more MP and a larger aperture.
The LG V20 has more storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X50 Pro features longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 35% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.