Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro's overall score of 75.4. The LG V30 is an older cellphone than vivo X50 Pro, but LG could make it somewhat lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The LG V30 counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. Vivo X50 Pro shoots better videos and photos than LG V30, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.6 aperture, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger sensor and a much higher resolution back camera.
The LG V30 features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X50 Pro has better battery life than LG V30, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.