Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than vivo X50 Pro, having an 83.7 score against 75.4. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should provide very similar OS features. The LG V50 ThinQ is an older, a bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone than vivo X50 Pro.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X50 Pro captures just a bit better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos in low light environments and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a camera with way more MP.
Vivo X50 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4315mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.