Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has an overall score of 76.4, which is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Droid Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features and performance optimizations. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a much older and thicker device than vivo X50 Pro, but Motorola could make it a little bit lighter anyway.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better performance than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The vivo X50 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also has a much better resolution back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations and faster video frame rate.
Vivo X50 Pro features much more memory for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro features a little better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.