Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro, getting a 77.9 score against 75.4. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a older and a lot thicker phone than vivo X50 Pro, but Motorola was able to make it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit superior CPU than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a sharper screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixels count in each display inch.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video, a back camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution and higher 30 fps video frame rates.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.