Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting a 79.8 score against 75.4. These phones work with the same Android 10 operating system. Moto Z4's construction is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner than vivo X50 Pro, even though it was released around a year before. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a little better performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Vivo X50 Pro features a little sharper screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2376px resolution and a bit larger screen. The Moto Z4 features a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X50 Pro features greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 4315mAh battery size. The Motorola Moto Z4 captures a bit better videos and photos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have a 48 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.