Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is better than the vivo X50 Pro, with an 84.7 score against 75.4. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A32's construction is thicker and somewhat heavier than the vivo X50 Pro. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, while vivo X50 Pro comes with Android 10 operating system.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels, a greater screen pixel density and a little bit larger screen. Vivo X50 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video quality, a same resolution back camera and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger aperture. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A32 counts with improved battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.