Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) is much better than vivo X50 Pro, with a global score of 84.2 against 75.4. The Galaxy A7 (2018) construction is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the vivo X50 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit more than a year before. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a screen that is very similar to the vivo X50 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a bit greater pixels count in each inch of display. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same back camera sensor size, the vivo X50 Pro also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a much higher resolution camera and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The vivo X50 Pro features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.