Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than vivo X50 Pro, with a overall score of 91.8 against 75.4. The Galaxy A71 5G construction has the same thickness than vivo X50 Pro, but it's just a little bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, providing you some additional features and performance tweaks.
The vivo X50 Pro and the Galaxy A71 5G feature quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a slightly better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy A71 5G features a greater memory to store more games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G has a little longer battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.