Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 general score. Although it's the best in this review, we must note that it is also older, heavier and somewhat thicker. Vivo X50 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density.
The vivo X50 Pro features a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X50 Pro features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A80. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The vivo X50 Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A80, because although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a much lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.