Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro design is thinner than the vivo X50 Pro, although it's a little heavier and was released many years before. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version.
Vivo X50 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution, a bit greater pixel density and a little bit larger screen.
The vivo X50 Pro features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better resolution camera in the back, a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light environments and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.