Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, having a general score of 83.3 against 75.4. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M30s has a more recent 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, counting with some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy M30s's construction is older, just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than vivo X50 Pro.
The vivo X50 Pro features a bit better performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a screen that's very similar to the display in vivo X50 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy M30s has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number in each inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s features a slightly better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X50 Pro features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy M30s counts with a superior battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 39 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.