Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, with an 86.5 score against 75.4. Even being the best we compare here, the Galaxy M31 is a just a bit thicker and a little heavier phone than vivo X50 Pro. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy M31 has a newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
Galaxy M31 features a bit better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little better pixel density. The vivo X50 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo X50 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M31 has just a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a superior battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.