Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M31s has a newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, providing the user some extra features. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy M31s body is heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X50 Pro.
The vivo X50 Pro and the Galaxy M31s both feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy M31s has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little more pixels per screen inch. The vivo X50 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has just a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy M31s features a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M31s features a really longer battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 39 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.