Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is better than the vivo X50 Pro, having an 87.1 score against 75.4. The Galaxy Note9 is an older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier phone than the vivo X50 Pro. Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit faster processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a little sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Note9 has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The vivo X50 Pro features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has an 8% greater battery capacity. Vivo X50 Pro takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower video frame rate, a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video and a smaller camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.