Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a 79.3 score against 75.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older device than the vivo X50 Pro, but it is lighter and thinner anyway.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a sharper screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better number of pixels per inch of screen. The vivo X50 Pro counts with much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The vivo X50 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The vivo X50 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels camera and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.