Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ1 has a global score of 78.3, which is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. The Sony Xperia XZ1 construction is lighter and a little thinner than vivo X50 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. Vivo X50 Pro has just a bit better performance than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ1 features a bit sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixel density. The Xperia XZ1 has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo X50 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ1, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh. Vivo X50 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Xperia XZ1, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.