Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ3 has a score of 79.6, which is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 general score. Sony Xperia XZ3 is an older, somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than the vivo X50 Pro. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Sony Xperia XZ3 has 9.0 Pie version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, giving a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 features a more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch of screen. Sony Xperia XZ3 has a bit faster processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X50 Pro takes slightly better photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments.
The vivo X50 Pro features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.