Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. Despite of the fact Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is older and just a little thicker than vivo X50 Pro, it's body is still a little bit lighter. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little better processing power than vivo X50 Pro. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2246 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB.
The vivo X50 Pro features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The vivo X50 Pro features a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.