Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro is better than the vivo X50, getting an 84.9 score against 73. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while vivo X50 counts with Android 10 operating system. Apple iPhone 11 Pro's body is older, just a bit thicker and a bit heavier than vivo X50. Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a bit better processing unit than vivo X50, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Vivo X50 has a much greater storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X50 captures a little bit better photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality photographs and videos and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a much more megapixels back camera.
The vivo X50 has a very superior battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 3046mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.