Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is better than the vivo X50, having a overall score of 84.5 against 73. The iPhone XS Max construction has the same thickness than the vivo X50, but it is somewhat heavier. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit better performance than vivo X50, because although it has 2 lesser cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a quite higher pixels amount in each screen inch. The vivo X50 features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory.
Vivo X50 features superior battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4200mAh battery size. Vivo X50 captures better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.