| Global Score | |
| 73 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.3 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2013-10-31 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.43 x 2.72 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 480.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.40mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 300 hours standby time 17 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Google Nexus 5 has a general score of 76, which is a bit better than vivo X50's global score of 73. Despite of the fact Google Nexus 5 is much older and thicker than the vivo X50, it's construction is still noticeably lighter. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Nexus 5 has newer 4.4.3 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it offers a lot of extra features.
The Google Nexus 5 counts with a sharper screen than vivo X50, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a bit better pixels amount per screen inch. Vivo X50 features a bit faster CPU than Google Nexus 5, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X50 has a much better camera than Google Nexus 5, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations, a bigger back camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Vivo X50 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Nexus 5, because it has more internal storage. The vivo X50 counts with a really longer battery life than Google Nexus 5, because it has an 83% larger battery size.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.