Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is better than the vivo X50, having a score of 81.6 against 73. Google Pixel 2's body is lighter than vivo X50, although it's just a little thicker and was released 3 years before. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount per display inch.
The Google Pixel 2's storage for applications and games is just as good as the vivo X50 one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X50 has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X50 shoots better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a bigger aperture and a camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
The vivo X50 counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 56 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.