Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is just a bit better than the vivo X50, getting a global score of 79.8 against 73. Moto Z4's construction is just a bit lighter and a little thinner than the vivo X50, although it was released around 14 months before. Both phones we are comparing here come with the same Android 10 operating system, so both should count with very similar OS features.
The vivo X50 counts with a little sharper screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a bit larger display. The vivo X50 features a bit better processor than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X50 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has just a bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same resolution back facing camera, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a way larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
The Motorola Moto Z4 features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Vivo X50 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.