Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is better than the vivo X50's 73 global score. Galaxy A32 is a somewhat heavier and thicker phone than the vivo X50. Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, and vivo X50 works with Android 10 operating system. The vivo X50 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a little bigger screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels.
The vivo X50 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A32 features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has greater battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 19% greater battery capacity. The vivo X50 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 48 mega pixels, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the vivo X50 also has a larger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.