Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is better than the vivo X50, with a general score of 84.2 against 73. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a a little lighter device than the vivo X50, but both of them are equally thin. Galaxy A7 (2018) has a display that's just as good as the display in vivo X50, because although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a quite greater pixel number in each inch of screen.
The vivo X50 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 also has a higher amount of RAM. Vivo X50 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a 0.36 inches sensor, the vivo X50 also has a back camera with way more mega pixels, a lot better video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than vivo X50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X50 counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.