Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than vivo X50's score of 73. Although Galaxy A71 5G is a better phone than the vivo X50, we must tell that it is also a little thicker and a bit heavier. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features and enhanced performance.
Galaxy A71 5G features a screen that's very similar to the screen in vivo X50, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a just a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Vivo X50 has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a little better battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.