Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is much better than the vivo X50's overall score of 73. The Samsung Galaxy A80 is an older, thicker and much heavier cellphone than the vivo X50. The vivo X50 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2376px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the display.
Galaxy A80 features as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as vivo X50, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A80. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. The vivo X50 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A80, because although it has a way tinier sensor offering a much worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, a 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and the same video frame rates, the vivo X50 also counts with a bigger aperture.
Vivo X50 features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.