Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is better than vivo X50, with an 81 score against 73. Although Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a lot older and a little bit heavier than the vivo X50, it's construction is still a little thinner. These devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while vivo X50 has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
The vivo X50 has a little better performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 also has 2 GB more RAM. The vivo X50 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution, a quite bigger screen and a just a bit greater pixel number per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The vivo X50 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
The vivo X50 features a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot higher (4K) video definition, a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.