Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is better than the vivo X50, having an 83.3 score against 73. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M30s is a better phone than vivo X50, we must tell that it is also older, somewhat thicker and a little heavier. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M30s has a more recent 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
The vivo X50 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy M30s counts with a display that's just as good as the screen in vivo X50, because although the Galaxy M30s has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M30s counts with a much better battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy M30s has just a bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a much bigger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.