Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is much better than vivo X50's overall score of 73. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M31 has 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. Galaxy M31 is an a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone than vivo X50.
The vivo X50 features a bit faster processor than Galaxy M31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy M31 has a bit more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density.
Galaxy M31 has a greater storage to install applications and games than vivo X50, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a very superior battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.