Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is way better than vivo X50's global score of 73. The Galaxy M31s is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone than vivo X50. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M31s has a newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, providing the user some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Vivo X50 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy M31s has a display that is very similar to the vivo X50 one, because although the Galaxy M31s has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit greater screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a much better memory to store more apps and games than vivo X50, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M31s has a superior battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Galaxy M31s features a slightly better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.