| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 525 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 18 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge is better than the vivo X50, with a overall score of 81.7 against 73. The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge is an extremely older and just a bit thicker cellphone than vivo X50, but Samsung could make it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note Edge has the older 5.0 version while vivo X50 has Android 10.
The Galaxy Note Edge has a sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better screen density. Samsung Galaxy Note Edge features a bit better hardware performance than vivo X50, because although it has lesser RAM memory and less cpu cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Vivo X50 features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The vivo X50 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Edge, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The vivo X50 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 also counts with a lot larger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a way more mega pixels back camera.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.