Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than vivo X50, having an 85.5 score against 73. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is older, thicker and a bit heavier than the vivo X50. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better screen than vivo X50, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2246px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit more powerful processing unit than vivo X50. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Vivo X50 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X50 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.