Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a score of 80.3 against 78.8. Even though the Google Nexus 6P is much older than the vivo X60 Pro, it's construction is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter. Google Nexus 6P has a bit better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro has improved battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has a much better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better low-light images, better 60 fps video frame rates, a back facing camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution and a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.