Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. Despite of the fact Google Pixel 2 is much older and a bit thicker than vivo X60 Pro, it's body is still incredibly lighter. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen.
Vivo X60 Pro has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. Vivo X60 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has higher video frame rate, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos and a camera with much more megapixels.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.