Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, with a overall score of 81.3 against 78.8. The Google Pixel XL is a noticeably older and thicker device than vivo X60 Pro, but Google could make it just a little lighter anyway. The vivo X60 Pro features a superior processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and 8 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel XL counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixel number in each inch of screen. Vivo X60 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a bigger camera sensor, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a camera with way more megapixels.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X60 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.