Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a little bit better than LG V20, with a 78.8 score against 77. Vivo X60 Pro is a a little bit heavier cellphone than LG V20, but they have the same thickness. The vivo X60 Pro has a superior hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
LG V20 counts with a slightly better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixels density. LG V20 has a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo X60 Pro features a better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Vivo X60 Pro features superior battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 31% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.