Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a global score of 79.8 against 78.8. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z4 has the older 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11. Even though Moto Z4 is older than vivo X60 Pro, it's construction is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px. The vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster processor than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a camera with a 48 MP resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Moto Z4 features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.