Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is better than vivo X60 Pro, it must be noted that it is also heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while vivo X60 Pro works with Android 11 OS.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a bit bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a better screen density.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A32 has greater battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Vivo X60 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back facing camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.