Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 has a global score of 82.3, which is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 overall score. The Galaxy A60 is an older and just a bit thicker device than vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both devices we are comparing here include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, faster video frame rate and a camera with way more megapixels.
Vivo X60 Pro features a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy A60, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro features longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.