Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, having an 84.2 score against 78.8. Galaxy A7 (2018)'s body has the same thickness than vivo X60 Pro, but it is a little bit lighter. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a bit bigger display. Vivo X60 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) features a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.