Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than vivo X60 Pro, having a 91.8 score against 78.8. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding OS features. Galaxy A71 5G's body is older, a little thicker and just a little heavier than vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a slightly better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a back camera with much more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit superior battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.