Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro, getting an 84.9 score against 78.8. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Galaxy A80's design is older, thicker and somewhat heavier than vivo X60 Pro. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A80, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3700mAh. Vivo X60 Pro features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same video resolution and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.