Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is better than vivo X60 Pro's overall score of 78.8. The Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, and vivo X60 Pro counts with Android 11 OS. The Galaxy A90 5G body is older, somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than the vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit better memory for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X60 Pro has just a little better performance than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same camera sensor size, a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger camera aperture and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy A90 5G has just a little better battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.