Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, having an 81 score against 78.8. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is just a bit thinner than the vivo X60 Pro, although it is just a little bit heavier and was released many years before. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some additional features.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro features a little more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a just a little more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 resolution.
The vivo X60 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture. Vivo X60 Pro features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X60 Pro features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.