Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting an 83.3 score against 78.8. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy M30s construction is older, a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X60 Pro.
Vivo X60 Pro features a slightly better display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little bigger display. Vivo X60 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the same resolution camera in the back and the same video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M30s features a really longer battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 43 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.