Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has an overall score of 86.5, which is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 11 operating system. Samsung Galaxy M31's body is older, thicker and just a bit heavier than the vivo X60 Pro. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy M31 has a little sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy M31 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy M31 has a superior battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.